rcu: Use system_unbound_wq to avoid disturbing isolated CPUs
It was discovered that isolated CPUs could sometimes be disturbed by kworkers processing kfree_rcu() works causing higher than expected latency. It is because the RCU core uses "system_wq" which doesn't have the WQ_UNBOUND flag to handle all its work items. Fix this violation of latency limits by using "system_unbound_wq" in the RCU core instead. This will ensure that those work items will not be run on CPUs marked as isolated. Beside the WQ_UNBOUND flag, the other major difference between system_wq and system_unbound_wq is their max_active count. The system_unbound_wq has a max_active of WQ_MAX_ACTIVE (512) while system_wq's max_active is WQ_DFL_ACTIVE (256) which is half of WQ_MAX_ACTIVE. Reported-by: Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@redhat.com> Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-50220 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8400291e28
commit
0aac9daef6
@ -3539,10 +3539,10 @@ schedule_delayed_monitor_work(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
|
|||||||
if (delayed_work_pending(&krcp->monitor_work)) {
|
if (delayed_work_pending(&krcp->monitor_work)) {
|
||||||
delay_left = krcp->monitor_work.timer.expires - jiffies;
|
delay_left = krcp->monitor_work.timer.expires - jiffies;
|
||||||
if (delay < delay_left)
|
if (delay < delay_left)
|
||||||
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
|
mod_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
|
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void
|
static void
|
||||||
@ -3634,7 +3634,7 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||||||
// be that the work is in the pending state when
|
// be that the work is in the pending state when
|
||||||
// channels have been detached following by each
|
// channels have been detached following by each
|
||||||
// other.
|
// other.
|
||||||
queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
|
queue_rcu_work(system_unbound_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -3704,7 +3704,7 @@ run_page_cache_worker(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
|
|||||||
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING &&
|
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING &&
|
||||||
!atomic_xchg(&krcp->work_in_progress, 1)) {
|
!atomic_xchg(&krcp->work_in_progress, 1)) {
|
||||||
if (atomic_read(&krcp->backoff_page_cache_fill)) {
|
if (atomic_read(&krcp->backoff_page_cache_fill)) {
|
||||||
queue_delayed_work(system_wq,
|
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq,
|
||||||
&krcp->page_cache_work,
|
&krcp->page_cache_work,
|
||||||
msecs_to_jiffies(rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec));
|
msecs_to_jiffies(rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec));
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user