dm: fix spelling errors
Fixed some confusing spelling errors that were currently identified, the details are as follows: -in the code comments: dm-cache-target.c: 1371: exclussive ==> exclusive dm-raid.c: 2522: repective ==> respective Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4feb014bc7
commit
0a92e5cdee
@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ static void mg_copy(struct work_struct *ws)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool rb = bio_detain_shared(mg->cache, mg->op->oblock, mg->overwrite_bio);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(rb); /* An exclussive lock must _not_ be held for this block */
|
||||
BUG_ON(rb); /* An exclusive lock must _not_ be held for this block */
|
||||
mg->overwrite_bio = NULL;
|
||||
inc_io_migrations(mg->cache);
|
||||
mg_full_copy(ws);
|
||||
|
@ -2519,7 +2519,7 @@ static int super_validate(struct raid_set *rs, struct md_rdev *rdev)
|
||||
rdev->saved_raid_disk = rdev->raid_disk;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reshape support -> restore repective data offsets */
|
||||
/* Reshape support -> restore respective data offsets */
|
||||
rdev->data_offset = le64_to_cpu(sb->data_offset);
|
||||
rdev->new_data_offset = le64_to_cpu(sb->new_data_offset);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user