1
linux/arch/x86/lib/copy_mc.c

106 lines
2.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright(c) 2016-2020 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. */
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/instrumented.h>
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <asm/mce.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(copy_mc_fragile_key);
void enable_copy_mc_fragile(void)
{
static_branch_inc(&copy_mc_fragile_key);
}
#define copy_mc_fragile_enabled (static_branch_unlikely(&copy_mc_fragile_key))
/*
* Similar to copy_user_handle_tail, probe for the write fault point, or
* source exception point.
*/
__visible notrace unsigned long
copy_mc_fragile_handle_tail(char *to, char *from, unsigned len)
{
for (; len; --len, to++, from++)
if (copy_mc_fragile(to, from, 1))
break;
return len;
}
#else
/*
* No point in doing careful copying, or consulting a static key when
* there is no #MC handler in the CONFIG_X86_MCE=n case.
*/
void enable_copy_mc_fragile(void)
{
}
#define copy_mc_fragile_enabled (0)
#endif
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
unsigned long copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string(void *dst, const void *src, unsigned len);
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
/**
* copy_mc_to_kernel - memory copy that handles source exceptions
*
* @dst: destination address
* @src: source address
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
* Call into the 'fragile' version on systems that benefit from avoiding
* corner case poison consumption scenarios, For example, accessing
* poison across 2 cachelines with a single instruction. Almost all
* other uses case can use copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() for a fast
* recoverable copy, or fallback to plain memcpy.
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
*
* Return 0 for success, or number of bytes not copied if there was an
* exception.
*/
unsigned long __must_check copy_mc_to_kernel(void *dst, const void *src, unsigned len)
{
unsigned long ret;
if (copy_mc_fragile_enabled) {
instrument_memcpy_before(dst, src, len);
ret = copy_mc_fragile(dst, src, len);
instrument_memcpy_after(dst, src, len, ret);
return ret;
}
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ERMS)) {
instrument_memcpy_before(dst, src, len);
ret = copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string(dst, src, len);
instrument_memcpy_after(dst, src, len, ret);
return ret;
}
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
memcpy(dst, src, len);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_mc_to_kernel);
unsigned long __must_check copy_mc_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned len)
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
{
unsigned long ret;
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
if (copy_mc_fragile_enabled) {
instrument_copy_to_user(dst, src, len);
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
__uaccess_begin();
ret = copy_mc_fragile((__force void *)dst, src, len);
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ERMS)) {
instrument_copy_to_user(dst, src, len);
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
__uaccess_begin();
ret = copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string((__force void *)dst, src, len);
x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() The motivations to go rework memcpy_mcsafe() are that the benefit of doing slow and careful copies is obviated on newer CPUs, and that the current opt-in list of CPUs to instrument recovery is broken relative to those CPUs. There is no need to keep an opt-in list up to date on an ongoing basis if pmem/dax operations are instrumented for recovery by default. With recovery enabled by default the old "mcsafe_key" opt-in to careful copying can be made a "fragile" opt-out. Where the "fragile" list takes steps to not consume poison across cachelines. The discussion with Linus made clear that the current "_mcsafe" suffix was imprecise to a fault. The operations that are needed by pmem/dax are to copy from a source address that might throw #MC to a destination that may write-fault, if it is a user page. So copy_to_user_mcsafe() becomes copy_mc_to_user() to indicate the separate precautions taken on source and destination. copy_mc_to_kernel() is introduced as a non-SMAP version that does not expect write-faults on the destination, but is still prepared to abort with an error code upon taking #MC. The original copy_mc_fragile() implementation had negative performance implications since it did not use the fast-string instruction sequence to perform copies. For this reason copy_mc_to_kernel() fell back to plain memcpy() to preserve performance on platforms that did not indicate the capability to recover from machine check exceptions. However, that capability detection was not architectural and now that some platforms can recover from fast-string consumption of memory errors the memcpy() fallback now causes these more capable platforms to fail. Introduce copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string() as the fast default implementation of copy_mc_to_kernel() and finalize the transition of copy_mc_fragile() to be a platform quirk to indicate 'copy-carefully'. With this in place, copy_mc_to_kernel() is fast and recovery-ready by default regardless of hardware capability. Thanks to Vivek for identifying that copy_user_generic() is not suitable as the copy_mc_to_user() backend since the #MC handler explicitly checks ex_has_fault_handler(). Thanks to the 0day robot for catching a performance bug in the x86/copy_mc_to_user implementation. [ bp: Add the "why" for this change from the 0/2th message, massage. ] Fixes: 92b0729c34ca ("x86/mm, x86/mce: Add memcpy_mcsafe()") Reported-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Reported-by: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Tested-by: Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195562556.2163339.18063423034951948973.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:25 -07:00
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, len);
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
}