1
linux/kernel/cpu.c

326 lines
7.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* CPU control.
* (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Rusty Russell
*
* This code is licenced under the GPL.
*/
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
/* This protects CPUs going up and down... */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_add_remove_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_bitmask_lock);
static __cpuinitdata RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
/* If set, cpu_up and cpu_down will return -EBUSY and do nothing.
* Should always be manipulated under cpu_add_remove_lock
*/
static int cpu_hotplug_disabled;
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/* Crappy recursive lock-takers in cpufreq! Complain loudly about idiots */
static struct task_struct *recursive;
static int recursive_depth;
void lock_cpu_hotplug(void)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
if (tsk == recursive) {
static int warnings = 10;
if (warnings) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking\n");
WARN_ON(1);
warnings--;
}
recursive_depth++;
return;
}
mutex_lock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
recursive = tsk;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_cpu_hotplug);
void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void)
{
WARN_ON(recursive != current);
if (recursive_depth) {
recursive_depth--;
return;
}
recursive = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
/* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
int __cpuinit register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (task_cpu(p) == cpu &&
(!cputime_eq(p->utime, cputime_zero) ||
!cputime_eq(p->stime, cputime_zero)))
printk(KERN_WARNING "Task %s (pid = %d) is on cpu %d\
(state = %ld, flags = %x) \n",
p->comm, p->pid, cpu, p->state, p->flags);
}
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
}
/* Take this CPU down. */
static int take_cpu_down(void *unused)
{
int err;
/* Ensure this CPU doesn't handle any more interrupts. */
err = __cpu_disable();
if (err < 0)
[PATCH] i386 CPU hotplug (The i386 CPU hotplug patch provides infrastructure for some work which Pavel is doing as well as for ACPI S3 (suspend-to-RAM) work which Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> is doing) The following provides i386 architecture support for safely unregistering and registering processors during runtime, updated for the current -mm tree. In order to avoid dumping cpu hotplug code into kernel/irq/* i dropped the cpu_online check in do_IRQ() by modifying fixup_irqs(). The difference being that on cpu offline, fixup_irqs() is called before we clear the cpu from cpu_online_map and a long delay in order to ensure that we never have any queued external interrupts on the APICs. There are additional changes to s390 and ppc64 to account for this change. 1) Add CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU 2) disable local APIC timer on dead cpus. 3) Disable preempt around irq balancing to prevent CPUs going down. 4) Print irq stats for all possible cpus. 5) Debugging check for interrupts on offline cpus. 6) Hacky fixup_irqs() to redirect irqs when cpus go off/online. 7) play_dead() for offline cpus to spin inside. 8) Handle offline cpus set in flush_tlb_others(). 9) Grab lock earlier in smp_call_function() to prevent CPUs going down. 10) Implement __cpu_disable() and __cpu_die(). 11) Enable local interrupts in cpu_enable() after fixup_irqs() 12) Don't fiddle with NMI on dead cpu, but leave intact on other cpus. 13) Program IRQ affinity whilst cpu is still in cpu_online_map on offline. Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-25 14:54:50 -07:00
return err;
[PATCH] i386 CPU hotplug (The i386 CPU hotplug patch provides infrastructure for some work which Pavel is doing as well as for ACPI S3 (suspend-to-RAM) work which Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> is doing) The following provides i386 architecture support for safely unregistering and registering processors during runtime, updated for the current -mm tree. In order to avoid dumping cpu hotplug code into kernel/irq/* i dropped the cpu_online check in do_IRQ() by modifying fixup_irqs(). The difference being that on cpu offline, fixup_irqs() is called before we clear the cpu from cpu_online_map and a long delay in order to ensure that we never have any queued external interrupts on the APICs. There are additional changes to s390 and ppc64 to account for this change. 1) Add CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU 2) disable local APIC timer on dead cpus. 3) Disable preempt around irq balancing to prevent CPUs going down. 4) Print irq stats for all possible cpus. 5) Debugging check for interrupts on offline cpus. 6) Hacky fixup_irqs() to redirect irqs when cpus go off/online. 7) play_dead() for offline cpus to spin inside. 8) Handle offline cpus set in flush_tlb_others(). 9) Grab lock earlier in smp_call_function() to prevent CPUs going down. 10) Implement __cpu_disable() and __cpu_die(). 11) Enable local interrupts in cpu_enable() after fixup_irqs() 12) Don't fiddle with NMI on dead cpu, but leave intact on other cpus. 13) Program IRQ affinity whilst cpu is still in cpu_online_map on offline. Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-25 14:54:50 -07:00
/* Force idle task to run as soon as we yield: it should
immediately notice cpu is offline and die quickly. */
sched_idle_next();
return 0;
}
/* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
{
int err, nr_calls = 0;
struct task_struct *p;
cpumask_t old_allowed, tmp;
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
return -EBUSY;
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return -EINVAL;
raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE, hcpu);
err = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod,
hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
__raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod,
hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
__FUNCTION__, cpu);
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_release;
}
/* Ensure that we are not runnable on dying cpu */
old_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
tmp = CPU_MASK_ALL;
cpu_clear(cpu, tmp);
set_cpus_allowed(current, tmp);
mutex_lock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
p = __stop_machine_run(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpu);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
if (IS_ERR(p) || cpu_online(cpu)) {
/* CPU didn't die: tell everyone. Can't complain. */
if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod,
hcpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
BUG();
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
err = PTR_ERR(p);
goto out_allowed;
}
goto out_thread;
}
/* Wait for it to sleep (leaving idle task). */
while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
yield();
/* This actually kills the CPU. */
__cpu_die(cpu);
/* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone. Too late to complain. */
if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD | mod,
hcpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
BUG();
check_for_tasks(cpu);
out_thread:
err = kthread_stop(p);
out_allowed:
set_cpus_allowed(current, old_allowed);
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
out_release:
raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_RELEASE, hcpu);
return err;
}
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
if (cpu_hotplug_disabled)
err = -EBUSY;
else
err = _cpu_down(cpu, 0);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
return err;
}
#endif /*CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU*/
/* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
static int __cpuinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
{
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
int ret, nr_calls = 0;
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
return -EINVAL;
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE, hcpu);
ret = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE | mod, hcpu,
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
-1, &nr_calls);
if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n",
__FUNCTION__, cpu);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_notify;
}
/* Arch-specific enabling code. */
mutex_lock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
ret = __cpu_up(cpu);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
if (ret != 0)
goto out_notify;
BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu));
/* Now call notifier in preparation. */
raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE | mod, hcpu);
out_notify:
if (ret != 0)
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
__raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
CPU_UP_CANCELED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-09 02:34:03 -07:00
raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_RELEASE, hcpu);
return ret;
}
[PATCH] Change cpu_up and co from __devinit to __cpuinit Compiling the kernel with CONFIG_HOTPLUG = y and CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU = n with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE = y generates the following modpost warnings WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141b7d) and 'cpu_up' WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141b9c) and 'cpu_up' WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:__cpu_up from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141bd8) and 'cpu_up' WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141c05) and 'cpu_up' WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141c26) and 'cpu_up' WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between '_cpu_up' (at offset 0xc0141c37) and 'cpu_up' This is because cpu_up, _cpu_up and __cpu_up (in some architectures) are defined as __devinit AND __cpu_up calls some __cpuinit functions. Since __cpuinit would map to __init with this kind of a configuration, we get a .text refering .init.data warning. This patch solves the problem by converting all of __cpu_up, _cpu_up and cpu_up from __devinit to __cpuinit. The approach is justified since the callers of cpu_up are either dependent on CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU or are of __init type. Thus when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y, all these cpu up functions would land up in .text section, and when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n, all these functions would land up in .init section. Tested on a i386 SMP machine running linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2007-01-11 00:15:34 -07:00
int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
if (cpu_hotplug_disabled)
err = -EBUSY;
else
err = _cpu_up(cpu, 0);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
return err;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP
static cpumask_t frozen_cpus;
int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
int cpu, first_cpu, error = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
first_cpu = first_cpu(cpu_online_map);
/* We take down all of the non-boot CPUs in one shot to avoid races
* with the userspace trying to use the CPU hotplug at the same time
*/
cpus_clear(frozen_cpus);
printk("Disabling non-boot CPUs ...\n");
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (cpu == first_cpu)
continue;
error = _cpu_down(cpu, 1);
if (!error) {
cpu_set(cpu, frozen_cpus);
printk("CPU%d is down\n", cpu);
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error taking CPU%d down: %d\n",
cpu, error);
break;
}
}
if (!error) {
BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() > 1);
/* Make sure the CPUs won't be enabled by someone else */
cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "Non-boot CPUs are not disabled\n");
}
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
return error;
}
void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
int cpu, error;
/* Allow everyone to use the CPU hotplug again */
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
cpu_hotplug_disabled = 0;
if (cpus_empty(frozen_cpus))
goto out;
printk("Enabling non-boot CPUs ...\n");
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, frozen_cpus) {
error = _cpu_up(cpu, 1);
if (!error) {
printk("CPU%d is up\n", cpu);
continue;
}
printk(KERN_WARNING "Error taking CPU%d up: %d\n", cpu, error);
}
cpus_clear(frozen_cpus);
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
}
#endif