License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 07:07:57 -07:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
2010-12-16 10:38:51 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/ioport.h>
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/printk.h>
|
2017-01-27 02:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/e820/api.h>
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/pci_x86.h>
|
2010-12-16 10:38:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space
When we allocate address space, e.g., to assign it to a PCI device, don't
allocate anything mentioned in the BIOS E820 memory map.
On recent machines (2008 and newer), we assign PCI resources from the
windows described by the ACPI PCI host bridge _CRS. On many Dell
machines, these windows overlap some E820 reserved areas, e.g.,
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfe4dc00 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
If we put devices at 0xbff00000, they don't work, probably because
that's really RAM, not I/O memory. This patch prevents that by removing
the 0xbfe4dc00-0xbfffffff area from the "available" resource.
I'm not very happy with this solution because Windows solves the problem
differently (it seems to ignore E820 reserved areas and it allocates
top-down instead of bottom-up; details at comment 45 of the bugzilla
below). That means we're vulnerable to BIOS defects that Windows would not
trip over. For example, if BIOS described a device in ACPI but didn't
mention it in E820, Windows would work fine but Linux would fail.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-16 10:38:56 -07:00
|
|
|
static void resource_clip(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
|
|
|
|
resource_size_t end)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
resource_size_t low = 0, high = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (res->end < start || res->start > end)
|
|
|
|
return; /* no conflict */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (res->start < start)
|
|
|
|
low = start - res->start;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (res->end > end)
|
|
|
|
high = res->end - end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Keep the area above or below the conflict, whichever is larger */
|
|
|
|
if (low > high)
|
|
|
|
res->end = start - 1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
res->start = end + 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
static void remove_e820_regions(struct resource *avail)
|
x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space
When we allocate address space, e.g., to assign it to a PCI device, don't
allocate anything mentioned in the BIOS E820 memory map.
On recent machines (2008 and newer), we assign PCI resources from the
windows described by the ACPI PCI host bridge _CRS. On many Dell
machines, these windows overlap some E820 reserved areas, e.g.,
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfe4dc00 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
If we put devices at 0xbff00000, they don't work, probably because
that's really RAM, not I/O memory. This patch prevents that by removing
the 0xbfe4dc00-0xbfffffff area from the "available" resource.
I'm not very happy with this solution because Windows solves the problem
differently (it seems to ignore E820 reserved areas and it allocates
top-down instead of bottom-up; details at comment 45 of the bugzilla
below). That means we're vulnerable to BIOS defects that Windows would not
trip over. For example, if BIOS described a device in ACPI but didn't
mention it in E820, Windows would work fine but Linux would fail.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-16 10:38:56 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-02-09 09:13:42 -07:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2017-01-27 04:54:38 -07:00
|
|
|
struct e820_entry *entry;
|
2022-03-03 17:04:43 -07:00
|
|
|
u64 e820_start, e820_end;
|
2022-04-07 15:42:02 -07:00
|
|
|
struct resource orig = *avail;
|
x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space
When we allocate address space, e.g., to assign it to a PCI device, don't
allocate anything mentioned in the BIOS E820 memory map.
On recent machines (2008 and newer), we assign PCI resources from the
windows described by the ACPI PCI host bridge _CRS. On many Dell
machines, these windows overlap some E820 reserved areas, e.g.,
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfe4dc00 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
If we put devices at 0xbff00000, they don't work, probably because
that's really RAM, not I/O memory. This patch prevents that by removing
the 0xbfe4dc00-0xbfffffff area from the "available" resource.
I'm not very happy with this solution because Windows solves the problem
differently (it seems to ignore E820 reserved areas and it allocates
top-down instead of bottom-up; details at comment 45 of the bugzilla
below). That means we're vulnerable to BIOS defects that Windows would not
trip over. For example, if BIOS described a device in ACPI but didn't
mention it in E820, Windows would work fine but Linux would fail.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-16 10:38:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
if (!pci_use_e820)
|
2022-03-03 15:00:39 -07:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 06:06:21 -07:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
|
|
|
|
entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
|
2022-03-03 17:04:43 -07:00
|
|
|
e820_start = entry->addr;
|
|
|
|
e820_end = entry->addr + entry->size - 1;
|
x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space
When we allocate address space, e.g., to assign it to a PCI device, don't
allocate anything mentioned in the BIOS E820 memory map.
On recent machines (2008 and newer), we assign PCI resources from the
windows described by the ACPI PCI host bridge _CRS. On many Dell
machines, these windows overlap some E820 reserved areas, e.g.,
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfe4dc00 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
If we put devices at 0xbff00000, they don't work, probably because
that's really RAM, not I/O memory. This patch prevents that by removing
the 0xbfe4dc00-0xbfffffff area from the "available" resource.
I'm not very happy with this solution because Windows solves the problem
differently (it seems to ignore E820 reserved areas and it allocates
top-down instead of bottom-up; details at comment 45 of the bugzilla
below). That means we're vulnerable to BIOS defects that Windows would not
trip over. For example, if BIOS described a device in ACPI but didn't
mention it in E820, Windows would work fine but Linux would fail.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-16 10:38:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-03 17:04:43 -07:00
|
|
|
resource_clip(avail, e820_start, e820_end);
|
2022-04-07 15:42:02 -07:00
|
|
|
if (orig.start != avail->start || orig.end != avail->end) {
|
2022-12-08 12:03:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pr_info("resource: avoiding allocation from e820 entry [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
|
|
|
|
e820_start, e820_end);
|
|
|
|
if (avail->end > avail->start)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Use %pa instead of %pR because "avail"
|
|
|
|
* is typically IORESOURCE_UNSET, so %pR
|
|
|
|
* shows the size instead of addresses.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
pr_info("resource: remaining [mem %pa-%pa] available\n",
|
|
|
|
&avail->start, &avail->end);
|
2022-04-07 15:42:02 -07:00
|
|
|
orig = *avail;
|
|
|
|
}
|
x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space
When we allocate address space, e.g., to assign it to a PCI device, don't
allocate anything mentioned in the BIOS E820 memory map.
On recent machines (2008 and newer), we assign PCI resources from the
windows described by the ACPI PCI host bridge _CRS. On many Dell
machines, these windows overlap some E820 reserved areas, e.g.,
BIOS-e820: 00000000bfe4dc00 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
pci_root PNP0A03:00: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xdfffffff]
If we put devices at 0xbff00000, they don't work, probably because
that's really RAM, not I/O memory. This patch prevents that by removing
the 0xbfe4dc00-0xbfffffff area from the "available" resource.
I'm not very happy with this solution because Windows solves the problem
differently (it seems to ignore E820 reserved areas and it allocates
top-down instead of bottom-up; details at comment 45 of the bugzilla
below). That means we're vulnerable to BIOS defects that Windows would not
trip over. For example, if BIOS described a device in ACPI but didn't
mention it in E820, Windows would work fine but Linux would fail.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-16 10:38:56 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-16 10:38:51 -07:00
|
|
|
void arch_remove_reservations(struct resource *avail)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-07-16 01:00:57 -07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Trim out BIOS area (high 2MB) and E820 regions. We do not remove
|
|
|
|
* the low 1MB unconditionally, as this area is needed for some ISA
|
|
|
|
* cards requiring a memory range, e.g. the i82365 PCMCIA controller.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
if (avail->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
|
2010-12-16 10:39:02 -07:00
|
|
|
resource_clip(avail, BIOS_ROM_BASE, BIOS_ROM_END);
|
x86/PCI: Revert "x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions"
This reverts commit 4c5e242d3e93.
Prior to 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820
regions"), E820 regions did not affect PCI host bridge windows. We only
looked at E820 regions and avoided them when allocating new MMIO space.
If firmware PCI bridge window and BAR assignments used E820 regions, we
left them alone.
After 4c5e242d3e93, we removed E820 regions from the PCI host bridge
windows before looking at BARs, so firmware assignments in E820 regions
looked like errors, and we moved things around to fit in the space left
(if any) after removing the E820 regions. This unnecessary BAR
reassignment broke several machines.
Guilherme reported that Steam Deck fails to boot after 4c5e242d3e93. We
clipped the window that contained most 32-bit BARs:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000a0000000-0x00000000a00fffff] reserved
acpi PNP0A08:00: clipped [mem 0x80000000-0xf7ffffff window] to [mem 0xa0100000-0xf7ffffff window] for e820 entry [mem 0xa0000000-0xa00fffff]
which forced us to reassign all those BARs, for example, this NVMe BAR:
pci 0000:00:01.2: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:01.2: can't claim window [mem 0x80600000-0x806fffff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x80600000-0x80603fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:00:01.2: bridge window: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa01fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xa0100000-0xa0103fff 64bit]
All the reassignments were successful, so the devices should have been
functional at the new addresses, but some were not.
Andy reported a similar failure on an Intel MID platform. Benjamin
reported a similar failure on a VMWare Fusion VM.
Note: this is not a clean revert; this revert keeps the later change to
make the clipping dependent on a new pci_use_e820 bool, moving the checking
of this bool to arch_remove_reservations().
[bhelgaas: commit log, add more reporters and testers]
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216109
Reported-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4c5e242d3e93 ("x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612144325.85366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-06-12 07:43:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove_e820_regions(avail);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-12-16 10:38:51 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|