2017-12-03 16:27:29 -07:00
|
|
|
Creating Pull Requests
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This chapter describes how maintainers can create and submit pull requests
|
|
|
|
to other maintainers. This is useful for transferring changes from one
|
|
|
|
maintainers tree to another maintainers tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document was written by Tobin C. Harding (who at that time, was not an
|
|
|
|
experienced maintainer) primarily from comments made by Greg Kroah-Hartman
|
|
|
|
and Linus Torvalds on LKML. Suggestions and fixes by Jonathan Corbet and
|
|
|
|
Mauro Carvalho Chehab. Misrepresentation was unintentional but inevitable,
|
|
|
|
please direct abuse to Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original email thread::
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-07 01:05:00 -07:00
|
|
|
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20171114110500.GA21175@kroah.com
|
2017-12-03 16:27:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create Branch
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To start with you will need to have all the changes you wish to include in
|
|
|
|
the pull request on a separate branch. Typically you will base this branch
|
|
|
|
off of a branch in the developers tree whom you intend to send the pull
|
|
|
|
request to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to create the pull request you must first tag the branch that you
|
|
|
|
have just created. It is recommended that you choose a meaningful tag name,
|
|
|
|
in a way that you and others can understand, even after some time. A good
|
2019-08-09 16:29:07 -07:00
|
|
|
practice is to include in the name an indicator of the subsystem of origin
|
2017-12-03 16:27:29 -07:00
|
|
|
and the target kernel version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg offers the following. A pull request with miscellaneous stuff for
|
|
|
|
drivers/char, to be applied at the Kernel version 4.15-rc1 could be named
|
|
|
|
as ``char-misc-4.15-rc1``. If such tag would be produced from a branch
|
|
|
|
named ``char-misc-next``, you would be using the following command::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git tag -s char-misc-4.15-rc1 char-misc-next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that will create a signed tag called ``char-misc-4.15-rc1`` based on the
|
|
|
|
last commit in the ``char-misc-next`` branch, and sign it with your gpg key
|
2023-07-14 11:31:26 -07:00
|
|
|
(see Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst).
|
2017-12-03 16:27:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linus will only accept pull requests based on a signed tag. Other
|
|
|
|
maintainers may differ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you run the above command ``git`` will drop you into an editor and ask
|
|
|
|
you to describe the tag. In this case, you are describing a pull request,
|
|
|
|
so outline what is contained here, why it should be merged, and what, if
|
|
|
|
any, testing has been done. All of this information will end up in the tag
|
|
|
|
itself, and then in the merge commit that the maintainer makes if/when they
|
|
|
|
merge the pull request. So write it up well, as it will be in the kernel
|
|
|
|
tree for forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As said by Linus::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, at least to me, the important part is the *message*. I want
|
|
|
|
to understand what I'm pulling, and why I should pull it. I also
|
|
|
|
want to use that message as the message for the merge, so it should
|
|
|
|
not just make sense to me, but make sense as a historical record
|
|
|
|
too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that if there is something odd about the pull request, that
|
|
|
|
should very much be in the explanation. If you're touching files
|
|
|
|
that you don't maintain, explain _why_. I will see it in the
|
|
|
|
diffstat anyway, and if you didn't mention it, I'll just be extra
|
|
|
|
suspicious. And when you send me new stuff after the merge window
|
|
|
|
(or even bug-fixes, but ones that look scary), explain not just
|
|
|
|
what they do and why they do it, but explain the _timing_. What
|
|
|
|
happened that this didn't go through the merge window..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will take both what you write in the email pull request _and_ in
|
|
|
|
the signed tag, so depending on your workflow, you can either
|
|
|
|
describe your work in the signed tag (which will also automatically
|
|
|
|
make it into the pull request email), or you can make the signed
|
|
|
|
tag just a placeholder with nothing interesting in it, and describe
|
|
|
|
the work later when you actually send me the pull request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And yes, I will edit the message. Partly because I tend to do just
|
|
|
|
trivial formatting (the whole indentation and quoting etc), but
|
|
|
|
partly because part of the message may make sense for me at pull
|
|
|
|
time (describing the conflicts and your personal issues for sending
|
|
|
|
it right now), but may not make sense in the context of a merge
|
|
|
|
commit message, so I will try to make it all make sense. I will
|
|
|
|
also fix any speeling mistaeks and bad grammar I notice,
|
|
|
|
particularly for non-native speakers (but also for native ones
|
|
|
|
;^). But I may miss some, or even add some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg gives, as an example pull request::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Char/Misc patches for 4.15-rc1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the big char/misc patch set for the 4.15-rc1 merge window.
|
|
|
|
Contained in here is the normal set of new functions added to all
|
|
|
|
of these crazy drivers, as well as the following brand new
|
|
|
|
subsystems:
|
|
|
|
- time_travel_controller: Finally a set of drivers for the
|
|
|
|
latest time travel bus architecture that provides i/o to
|
|
|
|
the CPU before it asked for it, allowing uninterrupted
|
|
|
|
processing
|
|
|
|
- relativity_shifters: due to the affect that the
|
|
|
|
time_travel_controllers have on the overall system, there
|
|
|
|
was a need for a new set of relativity shifter drivers to
|
|
|
|
accommodate the newly formed black holes that would
|
|
|
|
threaten to suck CPUs into them. This subsystem handles
|
|
|
|
this in a way to successfully neutralize the problems.
|
|
|
|
There is a Kconfig option to force these to be enabled
|
|
|
|
when needed, so problems should not occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of these patches have been successfully tested in the latest
|
|
|
|
linux-next releases, and the original problems that it found have
|
|
|
|
all been resolved (apologies to anyone living near Canberra for the
|
|
|
|
lack of the Kconfig options in the earlier versions of the
|
|
|
|
linux-next tree creations.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Your-name-here <your_email@domain>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tag message format is just like a git commit id. One line at the top
|
|
|
|
for a "summary subject" and be sure to sign-off at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you have a local signed tag, you need to push it up to where it
|
|
|
|
can be retrieved::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git push origin char-misc-4.15-rc1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create Pull Request
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last thing to do is create the pull request message. ``git`` handily
|
|
|
|
will do this for you with the ``git request-pull`` command, but it needs a
|
|
|
|
bit of help determining what you want to pull, and on what to base the pull
|
|
|
|
against (to show the correct changes to be pulled and the diffstat). The
|
|
|
|
following command(s) will generate a pull request::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git request-pull master git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/ char-misc-4.15-rc1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoting Greg::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is asking git to compare the difference from the
|
|
|
|
'char-misc-4.15-rc1' tag location, to the head of the 'master'
|
|
|
|
branch (which in my case points to the last location in Linus's
|
|
|
|
tree that I diverged from, usually a -rc release) and to use the
|
|
|
|
git:// protocol to pull from. If you wish to use https://, that
|
|
|
|
can be used here instead as well (but note that some people behind
|
|
|
|
firewalls will have problems with https git pulls).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the char-misc-4.15-rc1 tag is not present in the repo that I am
|
|
|
|
asking to be pulled from, git will complain saying it is not there,
|
|
|
|
a handy way to remember to actually push it to a public location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The output of 'git request-pull' will contain the location of the
|
|
|
|
git tree and specific tag to pull from, and the full text
|
|
|
|
description of that tag (which is why you need to provide good
|
|
|
|
information in that tag). It will also create a diffstat of the
|
|
|
|
pull request, and a shortlog of the individual commits that the
|
|
|
|
pull request will provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linus responded that he tends to prefer the ``git://`` protocol. Other
|
|
|
|
maintainers may have different preferences. Also, note that if you are
|
|
|
|
creating pull requests without a signed tag then ``https://`` may be a
|
|
|
|
better choice. Please see the original thread for the full discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit Pull Request
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A pull request is submitted in the same way as an ordinary patch. Send as
|
|
|
|
inline email to the maintainer and CC LKML and any sub-system specific
|
|
|
|
lists if required. Pull requests to Linus typically have a subject line
|
|
|
|
something like::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GIT PULL] <subsystem> changes for v4.15-rc1
|