syncthing/lib/db/lowlevel.go

643 lines
16 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (C) 2014 The Syncthing Authors.
//
// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file,
// You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
package db
import (
"bytes"
"encoding/binary"
"os"
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
"time"
"github.com/syncthing/syncthing/lib/db/backend"
"github.com/syncthing/syncthing/lib/protocol"
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
"github.com/syncthing/syncthing/lib/sync"
"github.com/willf/bloom"
)
const (
// We set the bloom filter capacity to handle 100k individual items with
// a false positive probability of 1% for the first pass. Once we know
// how many items we have we will use that number instead, if it's more
// than 100k. For fewer than 100k items we will just get better false
// positive rate instead.
indirectGCBloomCapacity = 100000
indirectGCBloomFalsePositiveRate = 0.01 // 1%
indirectGCDefaultInterval = 13 * time.Hour
indirectGCTimeKey = "lastIndirectGCTime"
// Use indirection for the block list when it exceeds this many entries
blocksIndirectionCutoff = 3
)
var indirectGCInterval = indirectGCDefaultInterval
func init() {
if dur, err := time.ParseDuration(os.Getenv("STGCINDIRECTEVERY")); err == nil {
indirectGCInterval = dur
}
}
// Lowlevel is the lowest level database interface. It has a very simple
// purpose: hold the actual backend database, and the in-memory state
// that belong to that database. In the same way that a single on disk
// database can only be opened once, there should be only one Lowlevel for
// any given backend.
type Lowlevel struct {
backend.Backend
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
folderIdx *smallIndex
deviceIdx *smallIndex
keyer keyer
gcMut sync.RWMutex
gcKeyCount int
gcStop chan struct{}
}
func NewLowlevel(backend backend.Backend) *Lowlevel {
db := &Lowlevel{
Backend: backend,
folderIdx: newSmallIndex(backend, []byte{KeyTypeFolderIdx}),
deviceIdx: newSmallIndex(backend, []byte{KeyTypeDeviceIdx}),
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
gcMut: sync.NewRWMutex(),
gcStop: make(chan struct{}),
}
db.keyer = newDefaultKeyer(db.folderIdx, db.deviceIdx)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
go db.gcRunner()
return db
}
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
func (db *Lowlevel) Close() error {
close(db.gcStop)
return db.Backend.Close()
}
// ListFolders returns the list of folders currently in the database
func (db *Lowlevel) ListFolders() []string {
return db.folderIdx.Values()
}
// updateRemoteFiles adds a list of fileinfos to the database and updates the
// global versionlist and metadata.
func (db *Lowlevel) updateRemoteFiles(folder, device []byte, fs []protocol.FileInfo, meta *metadataTracker) error {
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
db.gcMut.RLock()
defer db.gcMut.RUnlock()
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
var dk, gk, keyBuf []byte
devID := protocol.DeviceIDFromBytes(device)
for _, f := range fs {
name := []byte(f.Name)
dk, err = db.keyer.GenerateDeviceFileKey(dk, folder, device, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
ef, ok, err := t.getFileTrunc(dk, true)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if ok && unchanged(f, ef) {
continue
}
if ok {
meta.removeFile(devID, ef)
}
meta.addFile(devID, f)
l.Debugf("insert; folder=%q device=%v %v", folder, devID, f)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if err := t.putFile(dk, f); err != nil {
return err
}
gk, err = db.keyer.GenerateGlobalVersionKey(gk, folder, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
keyBuf, _, err = t.updateGlobal(gk, keyBuf, folder, device, f, meta)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Checkpoint(func() error {
return meta.toDB(t, folder)
}); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := meta.toDB(t, folder); err != nil {
return err
}
return t.Commit()
}
// updateLocalFiles adds fileinfos to the db, and updates the global versionlist,
// metadata, sequence and blockmap buckets.
func (db *Lowlevel) updateLocalFiles(folder []byte, fs []protocol.FileInfo, meta *metadataTracker) error {
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
db.gcMut.RLock()
defer db.gcMut.RUnlock()
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
var dk, gk, keyBuf []byte
blockBuf := make([]byte, 4)
for _, f := range fs {
name := []byte(f.Name)
dk, err = db.keyer.GenerateDeviceFileKey(dk, folder, protocol.LocalDeviceID[:], name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
ef, ok, err := t.getFileByKey(dk)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if ok && unchanged(f, ef) {
continue
}
if ok {
if !ef.IsDirectory() && !ef.IsDeleted() && !ef.IsInvalid() {
for _, block := range ef.Blocks {
keyBuf, err = db.keyer.GenerateBlockMapKey(keyBuf, folder, block.Hash, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Delete(keyBuf); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
keyBuf, err = db.keyer.GenerateSequenceKey(keyBuf, folder, ef.SequenceNo())
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Delete(keyBuf); err != nil {
return err
}
l.Debugf("removing sequence; folder=%q sequence=%v %v", folder, ef.SequenceNo(), ef.FileName())
}
f.Sequence = meta.nextLocalSeq()
if ok {
meta.removeFile(protocol.LocalDeviceID, ef)
}
meta.addFile(protocol.LocalDeviceID, f)
l.Debugf("insert (local); folder=%q %v", folder, f)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if err := t.putFile(dk, f); err != nil {
return err
}
gk, err = db.keyer.GenerateGlobalVersionKey(gk, folder, []byte(f.Name))
if err != nil {
return err
}
keyBuf, _, err = t.updateGlobal(gk, keyBuf, folder, protocol.LocalDeviceID[:], f, meta)
if err != nil {
return err
}
keyBuf, err = db.keyer.GenerateSequenceKey(keyBuf, folder, f.Sequence)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Put(keyBuf, dk); err != nil {
return err
}
l.Debugf("adding sequence; folder=%q sequence=%v %v", folder, f.Sequence, f.Name)
if !f.IsDirectory() && !f.IsDeleted() && !f.IsInvalid() {
for i, block := range f.Blocks {
binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(blockBuf, uint32(i))
keyBuf, err = db.keyer.GenerateBlockMapKey(keyBuf, folder, block.Hash, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Put(keyBuf, blockBuf); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
if err := t.Checkpoint(func() error {
return meta.toDB(t, folder)
}); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := meta.toDB(t, folder); err != nil {
return err
}
return t.Commit()
}
func (db *Lowlevel) dropFolder(folder []byte) error {
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
db.gcMut.RLock()
defer db.gcMut.RUnlock()
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
// Remove all items related to the given folder from the device->file bucket
k0, err := db.keyer.GenerateDeviceFileKey(nil, folder, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(k0.WithoutNameAndDevice()); err != nil {
return err
}
// Remove all sequences related to the folder
k1, err := db.keyer.GenerateSequenceKey(nil, folder, 0)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(k1.WithoutSequence()); err != nil {
return err
}
// Remove all items related to the given folder from the global bucket
k2, err := db.keyer.GenerateGlobalVersionKey(nil, folder, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(k2.WithoutName()); err != nil {
return err
}
// Remove all needs related to the folder
k3, err := db.keyer.GenerateNeedFileKey(nil, folder, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(k3.WithoutName()); err != nil {
return err
}
// Remove the blockmap of the folder
k4, err := db.keyer.GenerateBlockMapKey(nil, folder, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(k4.WithoutHashAndName()); err != nil {
return err
}
return t.Commit()
}
func (db *Lowlevel) dropDeviceFolder(device, folder []byte, meta *metadataTracker) error {
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
db.gcMut.RLock()
defer db.gcMut.RUnlock()
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateDeviceFileKey(nil, folder, device, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
dbi, err := t.NewPrefixIterator(key)
if err != nil {
return err
}
var gk, keyBuf []byte
for dbi.Next() {
name := db.keyer.NameFromDeviceFileKey(dbi.Key())
gk, err = db.keyer.GenerateGlobalVersionKey(gk, folder, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
keyBuf, err = t.removeFromGlobal(gk, keyBuf, folder, device, name, meta)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Delete(dbi.Key()); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.Checkpoint(); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := dbi.Error(); err != nil {
return err
}
dbi.Release()
if bytes.Equal(device, protocol.LocalDeviceID[:]) {
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateBlockMapKey(nil, folder, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(key.WithoutHashAndName()); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return t.Commit()
}
func (db *Lowlevel) checkGlobals(folder []byte, meta *metadataTracker) error {
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateGlobalVersionKey(nil, folder, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
dbi, err := t.NewPrefixIterator(key.WithoutName())
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer dbi.Release()
var dk []byte
for dbi.Next() {
vl, ok := unmarshalVersionList(dbi.Value())
if !ok {
continue
}
// Check the global version list for consistency. An issue in previous
// versions of goleveldb could result in reordered writes so that
// there are global entries pointing to no longer existing files. Here
// we find those and clear them out.
name := db.keyer.NameFromGlobalVersionKey(dbi.Key())
var newVL VersionList
for i, version := range vl.Versions {
dk, err = db.keyer.GenerateDeviceFileKey(dk, folder, version.Device, name)
if err != nil {
return err
}
_, err := t.Get(dk)
if backend.IsNotFound(err) {
continue
}
if err != nil {
return err
}
newVL.Versions = append(newVL.Versions, version)
if i == 0 {
if fi, ok, err := t.getFileByKey(dk); err != nil {
return err
} else if ok {
meta.addFile(protocol.GlobalDeviceID, fi)
}
}
}
if len(newVL.Versions) != len(vl.Versions) {
if err := t.Put(dbi.Key(), mustMarshal(&newVL)); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
if err := dbi.Error(); err != nil {
return err
}
l.Debugf("db check completed for %q", folder)
return t.Commit()
}
func (db *Lowlevel) getIndexID(device, folder []byte) (protocol.IndexID, error) {
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateIndexIDKey(nil, device, folder)
if err != nil {
return 0, err
}
cur, err := db.Get(key)
if backend.IsNotFound(err) {
return 0, nil
} else if err != nil {
return 0, err
}
var id protocol.IndexID
if err := id.Unmarshal(cur); err != nil {
return 0, nil
}
return id, nil
}
func (db *Lowlevel) setIndexID(device, folder []byte, id protocol.IndexID) error {
bs, _ := id.Marshal() // marshalling can't fail
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateIndexIDKey(nil, device, folder)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return db.Put(key, bs)
}
func (db *Lowlevel) dropMtimes(folder []byte) error {
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateMtimesKey(nil, folder)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return db.dropPrefix(key)
}
func (db *Lowlevel) dropFolderMeta(folder []byte) error {
key, err := db.keyer.GenerateFolderMetaKey(nil, folder)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return db.dropPrefix(key)
}
func (db *Lowlevel) dropPrefix(prefix []byte) error {
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.close()
if err := t.deleteKeyPrefix(prefix); err != nil {
return err
}
return t.Commit()
}
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
func (db *Lowlevel) gcRunner() {
// Calculate the time for the next GC run. Even if we should run GC
// directly, give the system a while to get up and running and do other
// stuff first. (We might have migrations and stuff which would be
// better off running before GC.)
next := db.timeUntil(indirectGCTimeKey, indirectGCInterval)
if next < time.Minute {
next = time.Minute
}
t := time.NewTimer(next)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
defer t.Stop()
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
for {
select {
case <-db.gcStop:
return
case <-t.C:
if err := db.gcIndirect(); err != nil {
l.Warnln("Database indirection GC failed:", err)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
}
db.recordTime(indirectGCTimeKey)
t.Reset(db.timeUntil(indirectGCTimeKey, indirectGCInterval))
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
}
}
}
// recordTime records the current time under the given key, affecting the
// next call to timeUntil with the same key.
func (db *Lowlevel) recordTime(key string) {
miscDB := NewMiscDataNamespace(db)
_ = miscDB.PutInt64(key, time.Now().Unix()) // error wilfully ignored
}
// timeUntil returns how long we should wait until the next interval, or
// zero if it should happen directly.
func (db *Lowlevel) timeUntil(key string, every time.Duration) time.Duration {
miscDB := NewMiscDataNamespace(db)
lastTime, _, _ := miscDB.Int64(key) // error wilfully ignored
nextTime := time.Unix(lastTime, 0).Add(every)
sleepTime := time.Until(nextTime)
if sleepTime < 0 {
sleepTime = 0
}
return sleepTime
}
func (db *Lowlevel) gcIndirect() error {
// The indirection GC uses bloom filters to track used block lists and
// versions. This means iterating over all items, adding their hashes to
// the filter, then iterating over the indirected items and removing
// those that don't match the filter. The filter will give false
// positives so we will keep around one percent of things that we don't
// really need (at most).
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
//
// Indirection GC needs to run when there are no modifications to the
// FileInfos or indirected items.
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
db.gcMut.Lock()
defer db.gcMut.Unlock()
t, err := db.newReadWriteTransaction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer t.Release()
// Set up the bloom filters with the initial capacity and false positive
// rate, or higher capacity if we've done this before and seen lots of
// items. For simplicity's sake we track just one count, which is the
// highest of the various indirected items.
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
capacity := indirectGCBloomCapacity
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if db.gcKeyCount > capacity {
capacity = db.gcKeyCount
}
blockFilter := bloom.NewWithEstimates(uint(capacity), indirectGCBloomFalsePositiveRate)
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
// Iterate the FileInfos, unmarshal the block and version hashes and
// add them to the filter.
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
it, err := t.NewPrefixIterator([]byte{KeyTypeDevice})
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer it.Release()
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
for it.Next() {
var bl BlocksHashOnly
if err := bl.Unmarshal(it.Value()); err != nil {
return err
}
if len(bl.BlocksHash) > 0 {
blockFilter.Add(bl.BlocksHash)
}
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
}
it.Release()
if err := it.Error(); err != nil {
return err
}
// Iterate over block lists, removing keys with hashes that don't match
// the filter.
it, err = t.NewPrefixIterator([]byte{KeyTypeBlockList})
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer it.Release()
matchedBlocks := 0
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
for it.Next() {
key := blockListKey(it.Key())
if blockFilter.Test(key.BlocksHash()) {
matchedBlocks++
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
continue
}
if err := t.Delete(key); err != nil {
return err
}
}
it.Release()
if err := it.Error(); err != nil {
return err
}
// Remember the number of unique keys we kept until the next pass.
db.gcKeyCount = matchedBlocks
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
if err := t.Commit(); err != nil {
return err
}
lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) (#6283) * lib/db: Deduplicate block lists in database (fixes #5898) This moves the block list in the database out from being just a field on the FileInfo to being an object of its own. When putting a FileInfo we marshal the block list separately and store it keyed by the sha256 of the marshalled block list. When getting, if we are not doing a "truncated" get, we do an extra read and unmarshal for the block list. Old block lists are cleared out by a periodic GC sweep. The alternative would be to use refcounting, but: - There is a larger risk of getting that wrong and either dropping a block list in error or keeping them around forever. - It's tricky with our current database, as we don't have dirty reads. This means that if we update two FileInfos with identical block lists in the same transaction we can't just do read/modify/write for the ref counters as we wouldn't see our own first update. See above about tracking this and risks about getting it wrong. GC uses a bloom filter for keys to avoid heavy RAM usage. GC can't run concurrently with FileInfo updates so there is a new lock around those operation at the lowlevel. The end result is a much more compact database, especially for setups with many peers where files get duplicated many times. This is per-key-class stats for a large database I'm currently working with, under the current schema: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 7397482 KB data, 95 B + 809 B avg, 1637651 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x08: 1349 items, 12 KB keys + 10 KB data, 9 B + 8 B avg, 17 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 7 B avg, 30 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max Total 10426475 items, 968490 KB keys + 9202925 KB data. ``` Note 7.4 GB of data in class 00, total size 9.2 GB. After running the migration we get this instead: ``` 0x00: 9138161 items, 870876 KB keys + 2611392 KB data, 95 B + 285 B avg, 4788 B max 0x01: 185656 items, 10388 KB keys + 1790909 KB data, 55 B + 9646 B avg, 924525 B max 0x02: 916890 items, 84795 KB keys + 3667 KB data, 92 B + 4 B avg, 192 B max 0x03: 384 items, 27 KB keys + 5 KB data, 72 B + 15 B avg, 87 B max 0x04: 1109 items, 17 KB keys + 17 KB data, 15 B + 15 B avg, 69 B max 0x06: 383 items, 3 KB keys + 0 KB data, 9 B + 2 B avg, 18 B max 0x07: 510 items, 4 KB keys + 12 KB data, 9 B + 24 B avg, 41 B max 0x09: 194 items, 0 KB keys + 123 KB data, 5 B + 634 B avg, 11484 B max 0x0a: 3 items, 0 KB keys + 0 KB data, 14 B + 17 B avg, 51 B max 0x0b: 181836 items, 2363 KB keys + 10694 KB data, 13 B + 58 B avg, 173 B max 0x0d: 44282 items, 1461 KB keys + 61081 KB data, 33 B + 1379 B avg, 1637399 B max Total 10469408 items, 969939 KB keys + 4477905 KB data. ``` Class 00 is now down to 2.6 GB, with just 61 MB added in class 0d. There will be some additional reads in some cases which theoretically hurts performance, but this will be more than compensated for by smaller writes and better compaction. On my own home setup which just has three devices and a handful of folders the difference is smaller in absolute numbers of course, but still less than half the old size: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 306860 KB data, 70 B + 1032 B avg, 103237 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... Total 1947412 items, 151268 KB keys + 337485 KB data. ``` to: ``` 0x00: 297122 items, 20894 KB keys + 37038 KB data, 70 B + 124 B avg, 520 B max 0x01: 115299 items, 7738 KB keys + 17542 KB data, 67 B + 152 B avg, 419 B max 0x02: 1430537 items, 121223 KB keys + 5722 KB data, 84 B + 4 B avg, 253 B max ... 0x0d: 18041 items, 595 KB keys + 71964 KB data, 33 B + 3988 B avg, 101109 B max Total 1965447 items, 151863 KB keys + 139628 KB data. ``` * wip * wip * wip * wip
2020-01-24 00:35:44 -07:00
return db.Compact()
}
func unmarshalVersionList(data []byte) (VersionList, bool) {
var vl VersionList
if err := vl.Unmarshal(data); err != nil {
l.Debugln("unmarshal error:", err)
return VersionList{}, false
}
if len(vl.Versions) == 0 {
l.Debugln("empty version list")
return VersionList{}, false
}
return vl, true
}
// unchanged checks if two files are the same and thus don't need to be updated.
// Local flags or the invalid bit might change without the version
// being bumped.
func unchanged(nf, ef FileIntf) bool {
return ef.FileVersion().Equal(nf.FileVersion()) && ef.IsInvalid() == nf.IsInvalid() && ef.FileLocalFlags() == nf.FileLocalFlags()
}